(The federal government’s foreign debt repayment obligations in 1999 are over $17 billion. ) It also means that the government will continue to fall far short of providing the basic public services for which it is responsible. The public sectorThe public sector will be smaller and more demonetized and, as stated above, more localized.
(That is, this is what it raised on its own, not counting the borrowing at home and abroad. ) With a highly-publicized tax collection campaign at the beginning of 1998, the government was slightly more successful in raising cash for a while. But as the virtual economy model predicted, the extra cash to the budget came at the expense of the rest of the economy and helped precipitate the August 17 financial collapse.
This means big gaps among regions, ultimately threatening national integrity. There will likely also be a lot of leakage, because the government plays a minimal role in stopping it. The danger is inequity, an even more fragile public sector, and continued looting and corruption. Since the default, tax collection in real terms has been below 1997 levels. This is clearly not enough for the country to stay current on its foreign debt.
The goal, he explained, is not a transition to a market economy, but finding the resources to resist capitalism. They play a fundamental role in the efficient functioning of a market economy. I am hopeful that college athletes will soon participate in the same market economy as the rest of the college sports industry. Nobody questions the necessity and convenience of embracing a well-functioning market economy within a smoothly-ran democracy. Why do self professed market economy advocates not take credit where it is due. That failure was the biggest early warning sign we had of fatal flaws in our market economy. In reality, economies are neither completely free-market nor completely planned.
Neither exists in “pure” form, since all societies and governments regulate their economies to varying degrees. Throughout this course we will consider a quantity of ways in which the U. S. government influences and controls the economy. The primary distinction between a free and command economy is the degree to which the government determines what can be produced and what prices will be charged. In a free market, these determinations are made by the collective decisions of the market itself. Producers and consumers make rational decisions about what will satisfy their self-interest and maximize profits, and the market responds accordingly. In a planned economy, the government makes most decisions about what will be produced and what the prices will be, and the market must follow that plan. When government intervenes, the market outcomes will be different from those that would occur in a free and competitive market model.
In 1997, Russia’s federal government collected less than 60% of its taxes in monetary form. Its cash tax revenues came to barely $23 billion at 1997 exchange rates. Even if we add to that its other sources of monetary revenues—privatization sales, customs duties—the government was able to raise no more than about $40 billion.